CONNECTED PHYSICS / STATES OF MATTER
Plasma physics
Retain mobile charge and self-consistent fields. Choose collisional kinetics, collisionless kinetics, or a fluid approximation by comparing physical length and time scales.
Matter pathway: atom → solid → liquid → gas → plasma. Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory provide foundations across the pathway; they are not additional phases. This is a connected modeling route, not a universal heating curve. Actual phases depend on pressure, composition, and kinetics.
1. Solve ionization together with charge and nuclei conservation
- For a single atomic species with only the first ionization stage, impose bulk charge neutrality and conservation of nuclei.
- Substitute these populations into Saha’s relation from the gas page to obtain x²=A(1−x).
- Choose the root between zero and one. The displayed rationalized form avoids cancellation at large A; for A=0 the solution is x=0.
Connection / worked consequence. Worked example: A=1 gives x=(√5−1)/2≈0.618034. This is a dimensionless equilibrium example, not a universal temperature for 62% ionization.
↑ Return to the state pathway2. Derive collective screening and its validity criteria
- Use an isothermal Boltzmann response for each mobile species in a small electrostatic potential.
- Expand to first order and cancel the unperturbed charge density by neutrality. Insert the induced charge into Poisson’s equation, away from the test charge.
- Solve the radial screened-Poisson equation with decay at infinity; the source singularity fixes the Coulomb prefactor.
Connection / worked consequence. For a classical collective plasma, check λD/L much smaller than one and many particles in a Debye sphere. Also compare plasma oscillation, collision, and observation times. Ionization fraction alone is insufficient.
↑ Return to the state pathway3. Keep the mean field, then decide whether collisions matter
- Evolve each charged species under its Lorentz force, using fields sourced by the distributions themselves.
- When collisional changes are negligible over the time of interest, set Cs=0 to obtain Vlasov-Maxwell. Collisionless does not mean particles feel no forces.
- In an electrostatic approximation, set E=−grad φ and solve Poisson’s equation; omitting magnetic and radiative dynamics gives a Vlasov-Poisson specialization.
Connection / worked consequence. Weak long-range interactions can accumulate into a large collective field even when individual encounters are small. This is why ideal neutral-gas kinetics cannot simply be reused unchanged.
↑ Return to the state pathway4. Take moments and close at magnetohydrodynamic scales
- Take species velocity moments, sum momentum equations, and adopt a single-fluid bulk velocity with an appropriate total-pressure closure.
- Neglect electron inertia, Hall, and other generalized-Ohm terms under the selected ordering; use a scalar electrical resistivity ηel.
- Combine Ohm’s law with Faraday’s law and Ampere’s law without displacement current. For uniform resistivity and div B=0, obtain the displayed induction equation.
Connection / worked consequence. Ideal MHD additionally sets ηel=0. A plasma may instead be collisionless and anisotropic, requiring kinetic or extended-fluid closures; plasma does not automatically imply MHD.
↑ Return to the state pathwayRelated models & worked graphical examples
These entries come from the existing catalog. Open a formulation here, or follow its link for the complete model and three worked examples.
Debye–Hückel model
Approximates ionic activity using screened electrostatic interactions.
Assumptions. Dilute-solution limiting law; concentrations, standard state and coefficient A must use a consistent convention.
Application. Dilute electrolyte activity corrections.
Full model, derivation, references, numerical techniques & 3 worked graphs ↗Boltzmann kinetic equation
Evolves a particle distribution under transport and collisions.
Assumptions. Boltzmann kinetic equation; collision assumptions, molecular interaction laws and closure determine C[f].
Application. Gas kinetics outside simple continuum conditions.
Full model, derivation, references, numerical techniques & 3 worked graphs ↗Vlasov–Poisson model
Couples collisionless distribution dynamics to electrostatic fields.
Assumptions. Multiple species contribute ρ=Σs qs∫fsdv; electrostatic approximation omits electromagnetic induction and radiation.
Application. Electrostatic waves in a plasma.
Full model, derivation, references, numerical techniques & 3 worked graphs ↗Vlasov–Maxwell model
Couples collisionless kinetic distributions to electromagnetic fields.
Assumptions. Nonrelativistic phase-space form shown; relativistic momentum coordinates are required for high-energy particles.
Application. Kinetic plasma-wave behavior.
Full model, derivation, references, numerical techniques & 3 worked graphs ↗Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)
Treats a conducting fluid coupled to a magnetic field.
Assumptions. Simple resistive MHD with constant magnetic diffusivity ηm; continuity, energy and ∇·B=0 complete the system.
Application. Large-scale magnetized-plasma motion.
Full model, derivation, references, numerical techniques & 3 worked graphs ↗Particle-in-cell (PIC)
Couples moving computational particles to fields on a mesh.
Assumptions. PIC scheme; charge-conserving deposition, field solver, particle shape W and time integration determine numerical behavior.
Application. A kinetic plasma simulation.
Full model, derivation, references, numerical techniques & 3 worked graphs ↗Notation used throughout
n: number density (m⁻³); N: particle count; ρ: mass density (kg m⁻³); ρc: charge density; p: pressure; T: temperature (K); kB: Boltzmann constant; h, ℏ: Planck constants; β=1/(kBT); μ: chemical potential; f: phase-space distribution; g(r): pair distribution. In solid displacements u is a displacement; in the liquid closure u(r) is pair energy; in fluid equations u is bulk velocity. Subscripts identify phase or species. Every approximation must use consistent SI units or explicitly stated reduced units.